Search for: "PRICE v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 1 - 20
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
European Commission: Losing the War on Corporate International Transfer Pricing, 45 Loy. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:51 am
AT&T [corporate website] had opposed the release of various documents, including invoices and e-mails with pricing and billing information, collected in the course of a Federal Communication Commission (FCC) [official website] Enforcement Bureau investigation... [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
The Supreme Court's March 1, 2011 decision in Federal Communications Commission et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm
Telecom Association v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
” (quoting Ramirez v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 7:21 am
The lawsuit is captioned, Burnett et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 6:22 pm
The Commission’s complaint seeks a permanent injunction, civil monetary penalty, and a bar banning the CEO from serving as any public company’s officer or director (SEC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:09 am
Corporate Cleaning Services, Inc., 782 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2015). [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:06 am
Facts: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the "Commission"), as part of Montgomery County, and URS Corporation ("URS") entered into an agreement for URS to provide the Commission with engineering services for the construction of the Rock Creek Hiker-Biker Trail Bridge over Veirs Mill Road. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
The ACCC has been successful in 2 recent prosecutions: In Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Abalone Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1834 penalties totalling $927,500 were imposed on individuals and companies involved in a Victorian abalone cartel. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:19 am
In Muldrow v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:39 pm
Court of Appeals in Cincinnati has ruled that Robinson-Patman Act claims should not have been dismissed against retail electricity service provider Duke Energy Corporation for discriminating in price between different purchasers through Duke subsidiaries and an affiliated company. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
In Muldrow v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 11:13 pm
The reasons for Justice Heerey's decision to accept the settlement between ACCC and Visy and impose record penalties ($36 million fine imposed on Visy for 37 contraventions under section 76(3) Trade Practices Act) are set out in his 333 paragraph judgment in Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Visy Industries Holdings Pty Limited (No 3) [2007] FCA 1617 Between January 2000 and October 2004 companies in the Visy Group and certain officers of those companies… [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:15 am
Z Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:22 am
The article uses Besinger v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:22 am
The article uses Besinger v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm
V. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:15 am
We will begin a series of posts on the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the corporate governance process. [read post]
