Search for: "PRICE v. ROGERS" Results 1 - 20 of 379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2015, 6:23 am by Beth Graham
Rogers, Professor of Law, Paul and Marjorie Price Faculty Scholar, and Professor of Ethics, Regulation, and The Rule of Law at Pennsylvania State University’s Dickinson School of Law, and Alex Wiker, Post-Graduate Fellow in International Arbitration at Pennsylvania State University, have published “Fraport v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm by admin
August 20, 2013 Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced the fairly long-awaited decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (per Marrocco J.) in the Rogers Chatr misleading advertising and performance claims case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Holly Hayes One month ago, we started our health care conflict resolution series (see Part I,  Part II, Part III, and Part IV) focusing on the Roger Fisher, William Ury Getting to YES principled negotiation method involving: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The civil antitrust case in the Northern District of Illinois, Maplevale Farms Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by SHG
The price to be paid for the government failing to do as it says, keep its word, prove that it can be trusted, is that the people won’t trust it. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
By Holly Hayes Bovio One month ago, we started our health care conflict resolution series (see Part I,  Part II, Part III, and Part IV) focusing on the Roger Fisher, William Ury Getting to YES principled negotiation method involving: 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
“Trump promises ‘massive permit reform’ in infrastructure bill” [Melanie Zanona, The Hill] Murr v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:01 pm by Gregory Forman
The October 21, 2020 South Carolina Court of Appeals opinion in Rogers v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]