Search for: "PROMOTE THE VOTE V SECRETARY OF STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 8:55 am by Adam Wagner
Chester v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1439 (17 December 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has rejected a claim by a man convicted of raping and murdering a seven-year-old girl that the court should grant him the right to vote. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 11:25 am by Kary L. Moss
In most states, the integrity of the vote depends upon the secretary of state as the state’s chief election officer responsible for the oversight and administration of elections. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Couldn’t the Senate vote on each nominee individually, as Tuberville suggested? [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
” The policy of promoting the alienability of property, and disfavoring restraints on alienation, reflects that approach to property. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court declared the Tenure of Office Act unconstitutional in its ruling in Myers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:04 pm
He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as by seeking recounts or audits of the popular vote in states or filing lawsuits challenging ballots and procedures. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:05 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
During the 1960s, the Council of State Governments, unhappy with the legislative reapportionment decisions of the Earl Warren Supreme Court, promoted a trio of corrective amendments. [read post]
If the amendment is passed, changes take effect the fifth day after the Secretary of State files the statement of the vote for the election. [read post]