Search for: "PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS"
Results 41 - 60
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
The county’s officials, according to the brief, have their own official interests in enforcing Proposition 8, and thus in defending it. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:49 pm
And although the official ballot proponents of Proposition 8…have properly intervened and offered a vigorous defense of Proposition 8, their Article III standing to appeal has been called into question by the plaintiffs and the district court. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
However when Proposition 8 was challenged in federal district court, the court permitted the official initiative proponents to intervene as defendants. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:26 am
The California Supreme Court decided as a matter of California law, that initiative proponents enjoy some special capacity to represent the state’s electorate when public officials decline to defend a law adopted through direct democracy. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:07 am
The Prop 8 proponents are at it again. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
California’s top elected officials refused to defend Proposition 8 because they considered it unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
There are forty-two counties that voted in favor of Proposition 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm
We need not and do not answer the broader question in this case, however, because California had already extended to committed same-sex couples both the incidents of marriage and the official designation of “marriage,” and Proposition 8? [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
Judge Walker wrote in part: As official proponents under California law, proponents organized the successful campaign for Proposition 8. . . . [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm
Only the intervenors, who organized the campaign in support of Proposition 8, favored a stay. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am
The Official Proponents of Proposition 8 appealed the district court’s substantive ruling and the intervenors appealed the denial of intervention. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
Perry) that found Proposition 8 unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The best argument for initiative-proponent standing is that elected officials shouldn&rsqu [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:47 am
Horton and related cases, was about as narrow a victory for the proponents of Proposition 8 that the Court could have rendered. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm
In San Francisco officials’ new brief in the “Proposition 8? [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
In particular, the Court needed to steer clear of damaging the initiative device in general even as it denied standing to Proposition 8’s sponsors in particular. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm
The judge said he had offered Proposition 8? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:22 pm
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
But many—myself included—think that, among the various scenarios, the most probable outcome (and one that is perhaps more likely than not) is that a majority of Justices will dispose of the case by finding that the Proposition 8 sponsors (also known as the official “proponents” of the measure), the only ones who defended against the challenge, do not enjoy standing in federal court to speak on behalf of the State. [read post]
