Search for: "PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS"
Results 61 - 80
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 8:50 pm
Asked for its views by the Circuit Court, it ruled last month that the Proposition 8 backers have a right under state law to go to court to defend Proposition 8 in the wake of the decision of California state officials to refuse to make any defense of the measure. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court could easily conclude that the requirements of federal standing are not necessarily met by the proponents in the Proposition 8 setting itself. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:12 am
Proponents argue the change is required to effectuate the new deadlines. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
According to the statement submitted by proponents of Prop 8, it is intended to invalidate all same-sex marriages in California, regardless of when or where the marriage took place. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
When the Proposition 8 backers filed an appeal of Judge Walker’s ruling in the Ninth Circuit, the challengers to Proposition 8 contested their “standing” to appeal. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm
That leaves only the Prop. 8 proponents. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm
The two gay couples who challenged Proposition 8, joined by media groups, urged its public release, but Proposition 8′s backers vigorously opposed that. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
Schwarzenegger challenge to Proposition 8. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:49 am
In ruling for Plaintiffs, Judge Walker found that Prop. 8 proponents failed to present credible factual evidence that Prop. 8 served a legitimate government interest, and in fact, Prop. 8 harms the state’s interest in equality “based only on antiquated and discredited notions of gender. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:19 pm
The official proponents of Proposition 8 (“Proponents”) intervened to defend the suit. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Californians for Safer Communities Coalition, the proponent of the ballot initiative, raised close to $8 million for the campaign . [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:46 am
This decision, of course, does not affect the standing or the separate appeal of the official proponents of Proposition 8. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:50 pm
The Supreme Court held that the proponents of Proposition 8 could not file appeals in federal court. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
The majority held that the official proponents of Prop 8 did not have standing to defend Prop 8 in federal court. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:20 pm
Justice Kennedy, expressed concern that if the Court were to hold that the Proposition 8 proponents lack Article III standing because they are not agents of the state of California... such a ruling might invite executive officials in California to effectively “thwart the initiative process” (Justice Kennedy’s words), simply by refusing to appeal lower court rulings declaring that such initiatives are invalid.... [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The proponents of Proposition 8 petitioned the court to delay implementing its marriage ruling until the election, but the court turned them down. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
His ruling against Proposition 8, the proponents of the measure said, should now be stricken from the books. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:48 pm
That decision was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit by the anti-marriage proponents of Proposition 8. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:26 am
We need not and do not answer the broader question in this case, however, because California had already extended to committed same-sex couples both the incidents of marriage and the official designation of ‘marriage,’ and Proposition 8? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm
The couples contended that the proponents of the marriage ban were trying to shield from public view their efforts to defend in court the discrimination they sought in Proposition 8. [read post]
