Search for: "PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
A separate bill would eliminate the authority of the SEC to regulate shareholder proposals in their entirety, mirroring the objective of an ongoing lawsuit intervention by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in National Center for Public Policy Research v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
A separate bill would eliminate the authority of the SEC to regulate shareholder proposals in their entirety, mirroring the objective of an ongoing lawsuit intervention by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in National Center for Public Policy Research v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:29 am
Special thanks to Charlotte Lee, Intern for her contributions to this article. [1] Public Prosecutor v Loh Cheok San [2023] SGHC 190. [2] https://www.cpib.gov.sg/press-room/press-releases/bunkering-company-and-staff-charged-cheating-and-disguising-benefits. [3] Prime Shipping Corp v Public Prosecutor [2021] 4 SLR 795, citing Tom-Reck Security Services Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor [2001] 1 SLR(R) 327. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
: two linked explainers about the law on “ethical investments” by charities and environmental, social, and corporate governance issues in light of the judgment in Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch) – which we noted here. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
At your service! [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
Enhancing access to essential products and services. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Legal Services Alabama, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Thus, companies choose to make disclosures related to ESG factors because many investors and consumers want to understand whether the companies in which they invest or from whom they purchase products and services are taking actions—either beneficial or harmful—that may impact corporate stakeholders[5] and, in turn, have an effect on present and/or future shareholder value. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2011, “the Division of Corporation Finance issued interpretive guidance providing [its] views concerning operating companies’ disclosure obligations relating to cybersecurity. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
The original harassment and privacy claim concerned a sustained campaign of online harassment, which included the creation of Twitter accounts impersonating Dr Smith and offering sexual services to the public. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
However, the Directive does not go as far as the UKBA, which has a corporate ‘failure to prevent’ bribery offence, in which a company can be liable for failing to prevent bribery by employees and other associated persons (which is defined very broadly to include third party service providers and subsidiaries). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
On April 21, 2021, the European Commission adopted the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which substantially expands the climate information that must be reported by covered companies. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
Instead, the court held that a company’s “knowledge” that it is assisting in the commission of human rights violations is sufficient. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Kiger v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:50 pm
In Dobbs, the Supreme Court reversed its previous 1973 Roe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
As it stands today, however, California businesses that are open to the public are still obligated to offer their goods and services in a non-discriminatory manner that comp [read post]
