Search for: "PUTZ v. PUTZ" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 5:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Not necessarily religiously discriminatory hostility, of course.)From yesterday's California Court of Appeal decision in Vogelgesang v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:11 am by Cleve Clinton
Understandably, the energy industry and lawyers across the state are closely following the real case with very similar facts – Enterprise Products Partners LP v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:22 am by South Florida Lawyers
Stratton v. 6000 Indian Creek:57.105 sanctions upheld against an attorney for putzing around with an eviction case:Section 57.105(1) was enacted to deter practices and legal advice of the sort displayed here. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:48 am by sally
Gebr Weber GmbH v Wittmer Putz v Medianess Electronics GmbH Joined cases C-65/09 and C-87/09; [2011] WLR (D) 210 “Where consumer goods, installed in good faith by the consumer, were not in conformity with the contract under which the consumer had purchased and and were restored to conformity by way of replacement, the seller was obliged pursuant to article 3(2)(3) of Parliament and Council Directive 1999/44/EC either to remove the goods from where they had been… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:27 pm
Christopher Bemis (White Box LLC, Minneapolis, MIN ), Harvey Haugen (Beechy Industries, Beechy Saskatchewan, Canada), Michael Hofmeister (Siemens Corporate Technology, Munich, Germany), Andreas Putz (Automotive Fuel Cell Corporation, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada), Raúl Quiroga-Barranco y Mariano Rivera Meraz (CIMAT, A.C.); asesoraron a sus grupos de estudio en los proyectos previamente asignados. [read post]