Search for: "Pace v Raisman & Assoc., Esqs., LLP" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Finmann, 15 NY3d 306 (2010) notwithstanding, Pace v Raisman & Assoc., Esqs., LLP   2012 NY Slip Op 03989   Decided on May 23, 2012   Appellate Division, Second Department is yet another case in which alleged legal malpractice in a trust setting is dismissed on statute of limitations grounds. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A legal malpractice claim accrues when the alleged injury to the client occurs, such as when the trust agreement was funded, regardless of the client’s awareness of the malpractice (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 67 [Pt Dept 2015]; Pace v Raisman & Assoc. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As to Plaintiff’s fourth cause of action, “[t]o properly plead a cause of action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff must allege that (I) the defendant made a false representation of fact, (2) the defendant had knowledge of the falsity, (3) the misrepresentation was made in order to induce the plaintiffs reliance, ( 4) there was justifiable reliance on the part of the plaintiff, and (5) the plaintiff was injured by the reliance” (Pace v Raisman… [read post]