Search for: "Pace v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 pm
The students argued the merits of a fictitious case Brendan Smith v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:16 pm
The students argued the merits of a fictitious case Brendan Smith v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 12:15 pm
It turns out that Smith v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
” When it comes to the Mar-a-Lago investigation, the order establishes that Smith will oversee “the ongoing investigation referenced and described in the United States' Response to Motion for Judicial Oversight and Additional Relief, Donald J Trump v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
Pace Law School hosted its annual Louis V. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:56 am
Fasulo, Kristen Carroll (’14)and Catherine Peña (’15) Pace Law School hosted the First Annual Louis V. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Pace v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking decision in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am
Smith, and Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
Like the suspected robber in Smith v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:40 pm
[09/24] Smith v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
” The First Circuit explained further that Bucci “firmly rooted its analysis in language from previous Supreme Court decisions, including Katz, Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:16 am
See Smith v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:39 pm
Smith, 137 S. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 9:06 am
The government argued it didn't need a warrant based on cases from the 70s based on third party doctrine - US v Miller (bank records) and Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
” Default as a strategy The defendant in Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Smith, which asks who should pay attorney’s fees in successful civil-rights cases brought on behalf of prisoners, and Marinello v. [read post]
