Search for: "Pacific Bell Telephone Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 3:05 pm
Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications - the Ninth Circuit held the Sherman Antitrust Act permits "price squeeze" claims against companies with no duty to sell to others at wholesale. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 3:19 pm
Pacific Bell, 2007 U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:50 pm
" Which T-Mobile may conclude, as it reviews its options, beats going the way of Pacific Bell, Ameritech, and Bell South. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 am
Roberts, Jr., wrote for the Court in Pacific Bell, et al., v. linkLine Communications (07-512). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Docket: 10-329Issue(s): (1) Whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies competitive rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC's interpretation of its… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:34 am
” Plaintiffs Kimberly McCarther and Juan Huerta were employees of Defendants SBC Services, Inc. and Pacific Bell Telephone Company, respectively. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
The anitrust case (Pacific Bell Telephone, et al., v. linkLine Communications, et al., 07-512) is a test of the theory that a “prize squeeze” violates the Sherman Act. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(in support of the petition) Brief amicus curiae of United States (recommending denial of certiorari) __________________ Docket: 07-512 Case name: Pacific Bell Telephone Co., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications Issue: Whether Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act permits a "price squeeze" claim if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 564 U. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
Christian, the court held 7-2 that federal Superfund laws do not necessarily bar state-law claims that would require companies to pay for clean-up beyond what EPA has already ordered, but landowners need to get EPA’s permission for additional clean-up. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Bell Tel. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
Triangle-Pacific Corp., 799 A.2d 95, 107-08 (Pa. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
S. state-building in the 1866-1932 period that claimed to be comprehensive, one might suppose that they would include the pacification by the U. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:43 pm
(Pix Wall Street Journal 28 Feb 2017)After a tumultuous first month in office--a month that appeared to solidify the great rifts among emerging political factions in the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
But the appalling civilian cost of these operations should be ringing alarm bells for those working to see a genuine settlement to the Afghan conflict. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
If you do find a debt collector on either of the lists, or even if the collector is not on the list, you can always contact Traywick Law Offices, LLC and we can put a stop to the annoying telephone calls. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
If you do find a debt collector on either of the lists, or even if the collector is not on the list, you can always contact Traywick Law Offices, LLC and we can put a stop to the annoying telephone calls. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The first edition of “Petitions to Watch” for the October 2008 term features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ opening conference of September 29. [read post]
