Search for: "Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Com. (2000)" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CROSS-EXAMINATION IS PERMITTED ON ISSUES RELEVANT TO THE WITNESS’S VERACITY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE SUBJECT OF THE FALSEHOOD IS MATERIAL
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
Consequently, the requested disclosure fits squarely within the policy rationale underlying the physician-patient privilege.IF OBJECT OF UTILITY FEES IS TO FUND A CITY’SGENERAL REVENUE, THE HANCOCK AMENDMENT IS VIOLATED.Arbor Investment Co. owns property in the City of Hermann and paid utility charges for gas, electricity, water/sewer and refuse/waste. [read post]
Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C. Blog - http://behrmccarterpotter.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Viewpoint-Neutrality Mandates Must Themselves Be Viewpoint-Neutral
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
"[229] The plurality opinion in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/