Search for: "Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The district court denied Pacific Gas and Electric’s (“PG&E”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Dan Clark’s Clean Water Act (“CWA”) claim. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The district court denied Pacific Gas and Electric’s (“PG&E”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Dan Clark’s Clean Water Act (“CWA”) claim. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Lafayette (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Real Party in Interest), Case No. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1480, 1488, fn. 3 [contention was deemed waived because "[a]ppellant did not formulate a coherent legal argument nor did she cite any supporting authority"].) [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Co. (2000) 80 Cal.App. 4th 1165, 1175. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:59 am
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.. 176 Cal. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
Pacific Gas & Elec. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Consequently, the requested disclosure fits squarely within the policy rationale underlying the physician-patient privilege.IF OBJECT OF UTILITY FEES IS TO FUND A CITY’SGENERAL REVENUE, THE HANCOCK AMENDMENT IS VIOLATED.Arbor Investment Co. owns property in the City of Hermann and paid utility charges for gas, electricity, water/sewer and refuse/waste. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Washington Beef is owned by AgriBeef Co., a privately-held company in Boise, Idaho. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
Hanley, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 By executive action, the Obama administration can boost the U.S. target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions beyond levels envisioned in legislation working its way through Congress, the head of the U.N. climate science network said Sunday. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
“Maricopa County’s particulate air pollution is a serious problem,” said Deborah Jordan, director of the Air Division in the EPA’s Pacific Southwest office. [read post]
