Search for: "Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
  Up North, segregation continues to be a reality in far too many schools as well, and groups like the Pacific Legal Foundation would like to keep it that way. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:09 am by Walter Olson
Chicago; Timothy Snowball, Pacific Legal Foundation; Foodservice Equipment Reports] Plus: “The Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age,” conversation with Julian Sanchez, Matthew Feeney, and Caleb Brown for the Cato Daily Podcast. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am by Elizabeth Slattery
Department of Education (brought by my colleagues at Pacific Legal Foundation). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:37 pm by Ilya Somin
[My wife Alison Somin, an attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, outlines the problem.] [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Brittany Hunter for the Pacific Legal Foundation on the Downton Abby law. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 2:38 pm
This entry was written by Paul Beard, an attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation in Sacramento; he co-authored an amicus brief in support of the petitioners that can be found here. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:23 pm
Sharon Browne, a principal attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, discusses the decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 3:13 pm
Associated General Contractors of America, represented by the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation, claims that Caltrans' efforts to give at least 6.75 percent of project contracts to companies owned by women and three minority groups violate the state and federal constitutions. [read post]
21 May 2009, 8:22 am
Sharon Browne, a principal attorney at the Pacific Legal Foundation, discusses the case. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Joshua Thompson
Thompson, staff attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation in Sacramento. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
My post a month ago on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:08 pm
&nbsp Certiorari Documents:  Petition for a writ of certiorari  Brief of respondents Vincent Concepcion, and Liza Concepcion in opposition  Reply of petitioner AT&T Mobility LLC  Supplemental brief of respondents  Brief amici curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  George Will takes up the Pacific Legal Foundation's antiregulatory campaign to reverse Slaughter-House on the privileges and immunities clause (WaPo). [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann previewed the case for this blog, as do Jaeeun Shin and Dara Brown for Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:14 pm by Stephanie Clark
The Service failed to make a timely 12-month finding, and a complaint filed by the Pacific Legal Foundation on behalf of the petitioners on November 20, 2015 sought to compel the Service to make a 12-month finding on the vireo. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Both Connerly and ACRI were permitted by the district court to intervene in the present case and were represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, a conservative/libertarian public interest litigation firm that has successfully represented proponents of Section 31 in other cases, including Coral Constr, Inc v City & County of San Francisco (CalSCt (2010); 93 EPD ¶43,961) and Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc v City of San Jose (CalSCt (2000); 76 EPD… [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Additional coverage comes from Asher Steinberg at The Narrowest Grounds, Alan Morrison at The George Washington Law Review, Andrew Pincus at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Tim Bishop and Chad Clamage at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Deborah LaFetra at Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, and Sharon Rosenberg at Thompson Coburn LLP. [read post]