Search for: "Packard v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
In United States copyright law, the “first sale” doctrine allows the purchaser of a lawfully-made copy of a copyrighted work to transfer the copy by a subsequent sale, rental, or other means. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:44 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Hewlett-Packard Co.Court: Delaware Supreme Court Docket: 208, 2011 November 21, 2011 Judge: Jacobs Areas of Law: Business Law, Corporate Compliance, Labor & Employment Law, Legal Ethics Plaintiff brought this action under 8 Del. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union Brief for AARP and the Public Patent Foundation Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party Brief for the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property Brief for the United States of America Brief for Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
Universal Health Services, 974 P.2d 1158, 1159-60 (Nev. 1999); Packard v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:10 pm
United Agric. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Hewlett-Packard Company, et. al. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
IPOff (PatLit) Of mistletoe and lost gloves: the tale of UK’s Peer to Patent (IPKat) References to the Court of Justice: more time, transparency needed (IPKat) Dead author, old manuscripts, live issues: a reader writes (1709 Blog) United States US General Bratz trade secret litigation – District Court C D California orders Mattel to pay MGA Entertainment $309 million (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer’s Mind) (Trade Secrets Blog) US Patent… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am
They partnered together and sold their software as a single unit. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
Otherwise, the royalty base must be limited to the “smallest saleable unit. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:35 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey April 6 charged a mergers and acquisitions attorney and a stock trader with conspiracy, securities fraud and other violations over their alleged roles in a long-running insider trading scheme that netted more than $32 million in illicit profits (United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:07 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York was recently asked to enforce a non-competition agreement between International Business Machines, Corp. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
SEC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(PatLit) United States US Patent Reform US Patent Reform: America Invents Act passes Senate with broad support and status update (Maryland IP Law Blog) (IPblog) (Patent Law Practice Center) Post-disclosure grace period – unique but good policy (Patently-O) What are the provisions of the proposed ‘First-inventor-to-file’ System in S. 23? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
Dec. 21, 2010), a party can be liable for contributory infringement without having imported or sold a product in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 2/16/11Cite: IBM Corp. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
As Wikipedia explains, the “94 United States district courts are the general trial courts of the United States federal court system”, which is why the federal cases I write about in my posts always originated in a U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:28 am
Folliard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
United Black Fund v. [read post]
