Search for: "Page v. Board of Adjustment" Results 1 - 20 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 4:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
(the “Yeshiva”) filed a 79-page complaint in federal court against the Township of Ocean, New Jersey, and the Township’s Zoning Board of Adjustment (the “Township) following the denial of an application to develop a yeshiva with boarding facilities for 96 male students between the ages 18 and 22 in a residential zone, to allow for advanced Talmudic study (the “School”). [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
It is 172 pages long, which puts it in the top three or so of the Board’s longest decisions. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 9:55 am by Patricia Salkin
Krousos v Zoning Board of Adjustment of Borough of Paramus, 2014 WL 3628862 (NJ Sup. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 10:35 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The petition contains 127 paragraphs and the verification is on page five of the petition, after paragraph four. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm by Howard Knopf
His conclusion that “hearings last on the average 22 days” (page 37) is highly questionable. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The opposition division, however, decided that example 3 of D1 using ENGAGE® 8400 was a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step, without dealing with that argument (Reasons for the decision, page 9, lines 6-16).In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant preemptively dealt with the enablement of the disclosure of example 3 of D1 and submitted that D18 is cross-referenced in the paragraph bridging pages 14 and 15 of D1 as a document describing the… [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist., 125 AD3d at 1408-1409; Matter of Baker v Board of Educ., 29 AD3d at 575; Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
Although a physician is not required to make any upward or downward adjustment in dosage during the "warning" step, the prior steps provide useful information for possible dosage adjustments to the method of treatment using thiopurine drugs for a particular subject. [read post]