Search for: "Page v. Page" Results 81 - 100 of 36,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 1:18 pm by David Jacobson
ACCC v Allergy Pathway In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 74 Justice Finkelstein of the Federal Court fined Allergy Pathway Pty Ltd (formerly known as Advanced Allergy Elimination) and its director, Mr Paul Keir, $7,500 each for contempt of undertakings made to the court following a successful 2009 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission action for false, misleading and deceptive conduct. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:07 am by admin
February 16, 2013 Earlier this month, the Ontario Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in the Yellow Pages Marketing misleading advertising case (see: Competition Bureau v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:05 pm
Magazine covers have been awarded trade dress protection,Time Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 11:23 am by Steve Bainbridge
Ann Lipton has a great analysis of the backstory of a classic partnership law chestnut. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 3:53 am by Giancarlo Frosio
Recently, the Court of Appeal of New Zealand decided Christopher Robert Murray And Ors v Ian Wishart and ruled that a third party publisher - the owner of a Facebook page that contained comments by others - was not liable for defamation without actual knowledge, overturning a previous 'ought to have known' test. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:46 am
Lexis survey they conducted; a full report is posted on their page of publications as a 183 page pdf. [read post]