Search for: "Painter v. Painter" Results 81 - 100 of 452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 4:02 pm by Scott Bomboy
In December 2018, a three-judge panel in the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling, Painter v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 3:05 am
What the CJEU did say was that:Individual words are not protected, because they are not (literary) works;A part of a work is entitled to the same protection as the whole, insofar as that part is sufficiently original in the sense that it is its author's own intellectual creation.According to the AG, this finding is "obvious":the author of a literary work cannot appropriate common words or expressions, in the same way that a composer cannot claim an exclusive right over the notes or a… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 3:33 am by Dan Filler
Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), which sought equal protection for racial minorities under the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 7:20 am by Matthew Curtis
Aitchison worked as a seasonal painter of high-rise buildings, and used marijuana to help cope with this chronic neck and back pain, but never raised the issue of accommodation with his employer. [read post]