Search for: "Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
City and County of San Francisco has come out – with the District Court concluding that even under Pakdel’s “relatively modest” standard, a landowner seeking to develop their property must still actually receive a final decision on the merits of their proposal before filing a takings claim in federal court. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
City and County of San Francisco On June 28, 2021, the Supreme Court decided the case of Pakdel v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:09 am
Pakdel v City and County of San Francisco, No. 20–1212, 594 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:05 am
City and County of San Francisco did not change the ripeness rules for challenging a zoning denial. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 7:56 am
City & County of San Francisco]. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:13 pm
"] In Pakdel v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1212, concerns when a takings claim becomes ripe for review. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
In City of Austin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Pakdel v. [read post]
