Search for: "Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan" Results 21 - 25 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
 This Court has found only two cases where such a requisite intelligible principle was lacking: Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Michael Seay
It is true that “[W]hen a statute is reasonably susceptible of two interpretations, by one of which it is unconstitutional and by the other valid, the court prefers the meaning that preserves to the meaning that destroys” (Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]