Search for: "Papes v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 9:17 am
Monroe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:50 pm
The Background Recall that the Supreme Court stated in Monroe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:38 am
Pape and its ruling that, where state action is present, section 1983’s color of law requirement is thereby met. [read post]
16 May 2010, 8:07 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
Pape (post of 11-29-09); on constitutional states of mind (post of 2-6-10); and on causation in fact and the Mt. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:39 pm
Pape (post of 11-29-09); on constitutional states of mind (post of 2-6-10); on causation in fact and the Mt. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
But it is an open question whether the Court could ever practically fashion more robust and judicially manageable limits on the spending power The High Court of Australia's decision in Pape v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
Pape, 365 U. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:00 am
Pape. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 12:16 pm
Georgia State University will be holding a symposium this October to commemorate the Supreme Court's decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am
Contents include:Nikos Lavranos & Ahmed Mazlom, The Investment Treaty Implications of Covid-19 Responses by States Ronan O’Reilly, EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment – A Rebalancing of Investment Relations Lawrence Northmore-Ball, Jennifer Harvey, & Amber Courtier, Micula v Romania – A Saga of Lasting Significance Ondřej Svoboda, UNCITRAL Working Group III and Multilateral Investment Court – Troubled Waters for EU Normative Power… [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:45 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Pape. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The court also considered the specific strand of authority concerning legally privileged documents disclosed by mistake, sometimes called the Ashburton v Pape jurisdiction (after Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:33 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 81 S.Ct. 473, 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961), that local governments are immune from suit under § 1983). 10 The central question in this case is whether the Clark County School District is an “arm of the state,” entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:39 pm
However, this changed in 1961 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided Monroe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:43 pm
Supreme Court decision, Screws v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:32 am
Raich is hard to reconcile with United States v. [read post]
