Search for: "Pappas v. Pappas" Results 121 - 140 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2009, 9:21 pm
My  tax preparer colleague, Bruce the Tax Guy, has responded to my recent post titled CPAs v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 6 to 9 June 2023, the trial in the case of LCG v OVD continued before Collins Rice J. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
  In addition to Center for Reproductive Law and Policy (just discussed), one of her more controversial cases was Pappas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
A wonderfully thorough treatment of these various “indicia” of ownership status is found in the post-trial, lower court decision in Matter of Pappas v Corfian Enters., Ltd., 22 Misc 3d 1113 [A] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2009], affd 76 AD3d 679 [2d Dept 2010]. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Last but not least, as one astute judge noted many years ago in Matter of Pappas, “[i]n the real world, particularly that in which close corporations operate, clear evidence of share ownership is often not found in the corporate books and records, for any number of reasons. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
It’s a type of deal protection, for example, that would have avoided the seller’s remorse suffered by the unsuccessful plaintiffs in the well-known New York case, Pappas v Tzolis, who sold their majority stake for $1.5 million to the minority owner who, within months, sold the company’s sole asset to a third party for $17.5 million. [read post]