Search for: "Parcell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 2:41 am by Family Law
Professors Naomi Cahn & June Carbone, on the GWU Law Review blog: At the core of the Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:45 am by Walter Olson
Wisconsin: is taking a sub-parcel of land compensable? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Appellate Division upheld the rezoning of a parcel from commercial to high density residential, despite the provisions of the local comprehensive plan and the failure to prepare an environmental impact statement. [read post]
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, the court held that the Board’s conclusion that 21 Seabran’s parcel needed 200 feet of frontage for every 300 gallons per day of wastewater was erroneous. 21 Seabran, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Krauser.John Ellwood Hinebaugh devised a large parcel of land to the Sebolds provided they, among other things, did not alienate their interest in the property and continued to farm it. [read post]