Search for: "Parcels v. Johnson"
Results 1 - 20
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2023, 9:12 am
In Paldino v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Not for now, though, and if one judge on the panel in State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
In its recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
” Over several years, the Johnsons bought additional parcels while working hand-in-hand with the town. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am
Well, yesterday, the Court overturned Williamson County, in Knick v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:40 am
In Leone v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:47 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm
” Johnson Assocs., 680 F.3d at 720; see also Hurley, 610 F.3d at 340. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
(The court notes that among Colton’s duties were to identify suitable parcels for development, and he apparently picked the parcel that ultimately ended up mired in litigation with the Lyonses.) [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
Johnson v Town of Hamburg, 2018 WL 6714375 (NYAD 4 Dept. 12/21/2018) [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 5:12 am
The Falmouth zoning board of appeals issued a special permit to defendant Johnson Homes, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
., the pharmaceutical manufacturer subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, in a landmark decision involving the learned intermediary doctrine, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:53 pm
Since the 1970s, Plaintiffs owned eighteen separate parcels of land located in the Township of Canton. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
In Lichoulas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Justice Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
After the Department finalized the acquisition of a parcel of land in Elk Grove, California, Stand Up for California! [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:49 pm
USA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:53 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:03 am
One Parcel of Property, 897 F.2d 97, 100 (2d Cir. 1990); two circuits review de novo, United States v. [read post]
