Search for: "Paris Hilton v. Hallmark Cards"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
It's tough to figure out who to root for when Paris Hilton sues Hallmark Cards.Does Paris Hilton get money for Hallmark putting her face and catchphrase ("It's hot") on a birthday card mimicking "The Simple Life"? [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:54 pm
Hallmark’s “Paris Hilton” card. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:34 am
Image via WikipediaWhether celebrity heiress Paris Hilton's lawsuit succeeds is in the cards--Hallmark Cards, that is.Hilton sued the Kansas City, Missouri-based greeting cards maker in U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
In 2007 Paris Hilton, the heiress who is "famous for being famous", sued Hallmark Cards alleging that one of the greeting card company's birthday cards constituted misappropriation of publicity and trade mark infringement, under Californian and federal law respectively. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:23 pm
Concerning whether or not the Paris Hilton card is in connection with an issue of public interest, the court agreed with Hallmark. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
The suit involves a card, produced by Hallmark Cards, that shows a cartoon character with Paris's head on it (pic related, it's the card). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
" Hilton v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:58 am
"Hallmark created a birthday card, whose front cover read: "Paris's First Day as a Waitress. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Hallmark Cards (August 31, 2009), Paris Hilton is a "flamboyant heiress" that "is 'famous for being famous.'" Slip op., at 12115. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
Hallmark was within its First Amendment rights to comment on Paris Hilton's persona [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:30 pm
Hilton v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
(Contra the absurd claim made by David Segal’s infamous NYT piece denigrating the teaching of such old cases as Hadley v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:24 am
The Court, as examples of less protected commercial speech, cited Paris Hilton’s claim against Hallmark’s use of her image and catch phrase “that’s hot” on greeting cards (Hilton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
Hallmark Cards, finding that a greeting card showing Paris Hilton working as a waitress wasn’t necessarily transformative. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 8:39 am
When Hallmark used Paris Hilton’s image and registered THAT’S HOT® mark in a greeting card, they also received a cease-and-desist letter, alleging, among other things, a violation of Hilton’s right of publicity and trademark infringement. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
The quote I just gave cites to a passage in Hilton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
The quote I just gave cites to a passage in Hilton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
The anti-SLAPP procedure has been used by defendants in right of publicity cases before, most notably in the lawsuit brought by heiress Paris Hilton against Hallmark Cards for using her likeness on a greeting card. [read post]
