Search for: "Paris v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The applicant, a French national, had been employed as an accountant in the Kuwaiti embassy in Paris since August 1980. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
United States, a case that could have major Fourth Amendment implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 2:46 am by Guest Author
The Gonzalezplaintiffs are families of victims of the Paris, Istanbul, and San Bernardino terrorist attacks. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am by Derek T. Muller
Professor Michael Morley has likewise recognized that these two clauses have been construed “in pari materia. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Tracy Taylor
  First, the defendants questioned whether the securities fraud claims of the putative class in the case, including purchasers of securities on a French stock exchange, remained viable after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
It is an excellent primer on the interplay (or lack thereof) of copyright and fashion in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[1] The constitutional sphere in the United States, the UK, Canada, and Germany are honorable members of that commonly explored (to put it mildly) “platinum club. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on  the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
” Scene 2: The proclamation creates exceptions to the entry bans based on  the national interests of the United States (among other grounds). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:59 am
The specific question, as phrased by the Court, was: Are foreign subsidiaries of a United States parent corporation amenable to suit in state court on claims unrelated to any activity of the subsidiaries in the forum State? [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am by Unknown
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]