Search for: "Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. Berkeley" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Contaminated but Remediated Soil and Cortese Listing Does Not Compel Preparation of EIR
16 Jan 2014, 10:45 am by Rick Rodriguez
As 2013 came to a close, the California court of appeal in Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
First District “Doubts” CEQA Operates In Reverse, Upholds Mitigated Negative Declaration For Urban Infill Project Despite Soil and Groundwater Contamination In Parker Shattuck Neighbors
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Parker Shattuck Neighbors, et al, v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2013 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
    Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Second District Upholds Application of CEQA’s Class 3 Categorical Exemption For New Small Structures To City’s Approval of Small Car Wash/Coffee Shop Project, Rejects Appellants’ Attempt To Invoke Unusual Circumstances Exception
27 Jul 2016, 11:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Focusing on the “initial step” in CEQA’s multi-tiered process, i.e., “a preliminary review in order to determine whether CEQA applies to a proposed activity” (quoting Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Upholds CEQA Categorical Exemption for Approval of Planned Parenthood Clinic in City of South San Francisco, Clarifies Implied Finding of No Exceptions is Analyzed for Record Support on Narrowest Possible Ground
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Focusing on the “initial step” in CEQA’s multi-tiered process, i.e., “a preliminary review in order to determine whether CEQA applies to a proposed activity” (quoting Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“This Woeful Record”: First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To Marin County’s Approval of 43-Home Mountaintop Subdivision Opposed For Nearly Five Decades By Neighbors And Town of Tiburon
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Redrawing CEQA’s “Parking” Lines? Second District Holds Parking Impacts of Covina Mixed-Use, Transit-Oriented Infill Project Are Statutorily Exempt From CEQA Review, Rejects Related Map Act Challenge
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Resources, § 21064.5; Parker Shattuck Neighbors v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2022 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2022 CEQA 4th QUARTER CUMULATIVE REVIEW
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Patrick Enright
County of Mono v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/