Search for: "Parker v Board of Governors" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
Yesterday, I wrote about the doctrine that “state action” is immune from federal antitrust law, a doctrine that dates back to the Parker v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 7:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It boils down to those communications among Parole Board and Governor's office people right after Victory won parole. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
The Copyright Board is surely a much smaller ship to turn if course correction is needed, as many from all viewpoints now believe to be the case.These developments are very promising and set the stage for the implementation of much needed regulations to ensure that the Board gets back and stay on course with the original vision from Judge Parker in 1935. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
For instance, the fact that Board members are appointed by, and may be removed by, the Governor and Senate, and the fact that Board members are specialists from different fields, are supposedly “[f]eatures of the Board’s membership [that] minimize the risk that [the Board] will forego its mandate and act with only a private purpose. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Mincer
Supreme Court will address in its upcoming term, is important because the Court previously granted states immunity from federal antitrust law in Parker v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Mincer
Supreme Court will address in its upcoming term, is important because the Court previously granted states immunity from federal antitrust law in Parker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
ACLU co-director Albert DeSilver wrote to Minnesota’s governor volunteering assistance in “the preservation of civil liberty. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:25 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:17 am by lawmrh
See, for instance, “The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections”, “Voters v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Sackett v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
In an interview with The New York Times, Stevens talked about what he called a telling flaw in the opening sentence of the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
In 2019, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into law a bill that established vote-by-mail for any reason. [read post]