Search for: "Parker v. American Family Insurance Co." Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2011, 12:20 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of this case is, Jose Manuel Campa Gonzalez v National Insurance Crime Bureau; Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Texas Supreme Court, for example, has a pending case, Parker v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm by Robert Liles
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm by Michael Cook
Recent Developments in Personal Care and Other Home and Community-Based Services in Medicaid and Medicare I. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
The plaintiff, Pearlie Talley, appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Family Dollar Stores of Ohio (Family Dollar), John Parker, Vincent Cowles, and Ric Spring, on her claims of discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Ohio's anti-discrimination statute and her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(North Chelmsford, MA; Thomas Hunton, President) American Family Healthcare Group Services Corporation (Malden, MA; Edouard Beugre, President) American Graffiti, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]