Search for: "Parker v. District Attorney"
Results 81 - 100
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2019, 8:44 am
The plaintiffs in Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Brown, District Attorney of Queens County, Kew Gardens (John M. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:04 am
The Waco case is Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:37 am
See Parker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 8:13 am
United Statesv v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:08 pm
Following cases such as U.S. ex rel Hixson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 6:08 pm
Following cases such as U.S. ex rel Hixson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:15 am
Town of Thomson Planning Board, 9 AD3d 556 (3rd Dept. 2004); Parker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:53 am
" This was citing Hines v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:27 am
Parker, Senior Assistant Attorney General. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 8:44 am
In Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009), requires plaintiffs' attorneys to file complaints alleging plausible claims. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case and the plaintiffs are back in federal court.The case is Catzin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:07 pm
Judge Parker was appointed to the district court by President Bill Clinton and to the Second Circuit by President George W. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
But the district court granted the employer's motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals (Parker, Jacobs and Restani [D.J.]) affirms. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
One of these cases was issued by the Texas Court of Appeals, Houston, (14th District) on May 17, 2011. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Parker Drilling Co., 337 F.3d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:33 am
" The style of the case is Travelers Indemnity Company v. [read post]