Search for: "Parker v. Green"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 4:47 am
Because it was insufficiently sensitive to the variety of justifications available, the majority in Parker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:01 am
March 13, 2007) (Kearse, Sotomayor, Parker). [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
Green, 2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
Twenty years later Judge Parker was on the panel that heard Briggs v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:12 pm
Parker - Urban Renewal and the Story of Berman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
Green. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:05 pm
Although the Supreme Court eventually upheld Levy's conviction in Parker v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
Patent Owner contends that, unlike the claims in [Parker v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 8:58 am
AOL, Parker, Zeran v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Southern Green Builders, LP and Sam Seidel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Yet in the case of Charles Comer v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 6:44 am
Because it was insufficiently sensitive to the variety of justifications available, the majority in Parker v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:53 pm
The case is Parker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 7:55 am
Zrinyi, Greene, and John or Jane Does I-V, Unknown Persons, 2008 WL 4649131 (D. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
"Parker said Young modified burden-shifting framework in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:57 am
By James Parker The Supreme Court waited 27 years after deciding the 1994 landmark case of Cambell v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:07 pm
The following essay by Jamal Greene is part of our thirty-day series on John Paul Stevens. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:55 pm
Most of his claims were dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, while his complaint regarding observance of a fast day was found not to have amounted to a substantial burden on his free exercise.In Parker v. [read post]
