Search for: "Parker v. Phillips"
Results 1 - 20
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2009, 8:33 pm
 The second half was devoted to English Renaissance music: John Nesbett's Magnificat, nine tunes by Thomas Tallis for Archbishop Parker's Psalter, and three motets by William Byrd. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 10:07 am
” In Verdantus Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:06 am
” That, in our view, is what Officer Phillips’ single question to Jewel Parker produced. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Officer Parker tried to get behind the Sebring to conduct a traffic stop, but the Sebring sped onto the 118 Freeway with Officer Parker still in pursuit. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Parker, in which they are considering a dispute over land on the Omaha Indian reservation in Nebraska. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:38 am
Contrary to defendant’s contention, the allegations underlying the claim are not “couched in terms of gross speculations on future events” (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm
Today, in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 2:25 pm
Grohmann and Katherine Vesely, O'Bryan Brown & Toner, Louisville for Morassutti Sean Ragland, Phillips Parker Orberson & Moore, Louisville for Lowe Richard P. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
Case Name: JOY KLOMLIAM v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:13 pm
Grohmann and Katherine Vesely, O'Bryan Brown & Toner, Louisville for Morassutti Sean Ragland, Phillips Parker Orberson & Moore, Louisville for Lowe Richard P. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:07 am
Case Name: MERIT ENERGY COMPANY v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
(See e.g., Leff v Fulbright & aworski, L.L.P., 78 AD3d 531, 533 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 17 NY3d 705 [2011] [damages in malpractice case “grossly speculative” where plaintiff could not establish what would have occurred but for defendants’ conduct]; Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Grp. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am
The allegation that plaintiff would have stopped speculating on the stock at a time when its shares were selling for an amount greater than his actual investment thus depends on “a chain of gross speculations on future events” (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
4 May 2022, 12:33 pm
From Phillips v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:48 am
Parker v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
Castano v. [read post]
