Search for: "Parks v. Consumer Law Associates, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 1:03 pm
MillerKing, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
It's based on my work with the Georgia Association of Club Executives v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
In my next blog I’ll look at those legal arguments. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ¹ The following is a list of the parties who have filed amicus briefs in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm
An iconic album … A genre-defining film … The late musical genius from Minnesota… In a precedential decision, NPG Records, LLC and Paisley Park Enterprises, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
(Analysis of CA AB587) Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s Social Media Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
On March 25, 2022, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Park Plus v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Starting in the 1970s, especially following research demonstrating the benefits to consumers of a number of business arrangements and contracts previously condemned by courts as per se illegal, the Court began to limit the categories of conduct that received per se treatment. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Tom Umberg, D-Santa Ana, wrote a letter to bar leaders on Dec. 7 warning that “any proposal that would materially change current consumer protections for clients receiving legal services and fundamentally alter the sacrosanct principles of the attorney-client relationship would be heavily scrutinized by our committees. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Tom Umberg, D-Santa Ana, wrote a letter to bar leaders on Dec. 7 warning that “any proposal that would materially change current consumer protections for clients receiving legal services and fundamentally alter the sacrosanct principles of the attorney-client relationship would be heavily scrutinized by our committees. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
On the same day HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Onwude v Dyer & Ors. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
SYMPOSIUM: The California Consumer Privacy Act, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 54, 2021, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2021-01, Justin Hughes, Loyola Law School Los Angeles, Margot E. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
East Park and its employees might prevail in a defamation lawsuit against Ms. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
Bloomberg law had an article. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm
The highest profile media law case of the week was the strike out application in the case of Markle v Associated Newspapers heard remotely on Friday 24 April 2020 by Warby J. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 4:13 am
Servs., LLC, 172 AD3d 827, 829 [2d Dept 2019]). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
This article originally appeared in the California Lawyers Association “Real Property Law Journal. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
This article originally appeared in the California Lawyers Association’s “Real Property Law Journal. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
