Search for: "Parks v. Multimedia Technologies, Inc." Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2013, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
Dismissing the employee’s pro se claims on summary judgment, the court held that the disparity in age between him and his “replacement,” standing alone, was insufficient to prove age discrimination (Harnack v Health Research Inc, November 3, 2013, Skretny, W). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Multimedia Games, Inc., 504 F.3d 1273, 84 U.S.P.Q. 2d 2017 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Marvel, on the other hand, publishes comic books, but does not own movie or television studios and does not operate any theme parks. [read post]