Search for: "Parris v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue,… [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
Times editorial discusses Doe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:42 pm
Texas, the 2003 case that overturned state sodomy laws, but perhaps they'll submit a question in writingMore on Roper v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 7:15 pm
At first instance in Woodside Energy v Kieronski [2016] WADC 144 the arbitrator held that Ms Kieronski was entitled to compensation for a psychiatric condition caused by stress from being stood down pending an investigation into allegations of serious misconduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 2:41 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
Justice Sotomayor parried this by noting other clauses in the compact did not expressly limit diversions to those within a state, yet logically had to be read as being so limited. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 9:43 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
The case was United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
