Search for: "Parsons v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
United States As mentioned above, the US Senate has voted in favour of legislation that could ban TikTok in the country if its Chinese owners refuse to sell. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
On 19 April 2024, Farbey J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Atkinson [2024] EWHC 888 (KB) in favour of the defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
Reserved Judgments Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Parsons v Atkinson, heard 26 and 27 February 2024 (Farbey J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Wilson… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Justice Lee stated that the evidence may change the outcome of the case and extends beyond Lehrmann’s credibility. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
As mentioned above, Secretary of State, Michelle Donelan admitted she was mistaken in suggesting that Professor Sang’s tweet constituted support for Hamas and her department paid Sang £15,000. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump began on 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
Brian Boynton, the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said in a statement that states “cannot simply declare federal laws invalid. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
On 28 November 2022, Collins Rice J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Garnett & Others [2022] EWHC 3017 (KB). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
IPKat has produced a book review of Intellectual Property Protection for AI-Generated Creations: Europe, United States, Australia and Japan, by Ana Ramalho, Copyright Counsel at Google, and a Guest Lecturer at Leiden University. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
pdf (overturning a state court's grant of pseudonymity upon its removal to federal court); Parson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 10:33 pm
U.S. (1926) ("Finally, Parsons' case, where it was the point in judgment, conclusively establishes for this Court that the legislative decision of 1789 applied to a United States attorney, an inferior officer. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
"Senator Cotton's bill is modeled after the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which 97 members of the Senate voted in favor of in 2016. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:00 am
Department of Justice In response to yet another FOIA request from Buzzfeed reporter Jason Leopold, this time for documents relating to the Mueller investigation, the Justice Department claimed it has as many as 19-billion responsive documents. [read post]
