Search for: "Party 2314" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
Mostyn J also held that the implied undertaking bound not just the parties receiving the disclosure of their spouses, but also the media (following the lead of Roberts J in Cooper-Hohn v Hohn [2014] EWHC 2314). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:18 am by Chris Castle
The Ghost Ship:  If TikTok were determined to be a front for a foreign government (this time the Chinese Communist Party), Americans could be prohibited from working for TikTok and advertisers could be prohibited from doing business with the company under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 50 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
" The current J-decision addresses the topic again, and refers to the EPC1973 situation, the explanatory notes of EPC2000's drafting, the distinguishing T 1402/14, R.51(2) as amended per 1/1/2017, and EPO form 2522, which was sent to the party in the present case and clearly states that a patent application is deemed withdrawn only upon expiry of the six-month grace period for paying the renewal fee with additional fee. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 10:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court found that current case law was consistent with the understanding that that a litigant who appeals the judgment of a board of zoning appeals under Code § 15.2-2314 must identify the governing body as a necessary party in the petition, and must do so within 30 days of the board of zoning appeals’ final decision. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 10:16 am by Patricia Salkin
The governing body for the locality served by the BZA is a necessary party under Code § 15.2-2314, and a litigant may not amend the petition after the 30-day period to belatedly add the necessary parties identified in Code § 15.2-2314. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
That means that dealers, auction houses, collectors, and associated parties actually must do the investigative diligence required so that they are not directly or indirectly aiding criminal activity. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Sapient Canada Inc. 2014 ONSC 2314 (paras. 145-157); and, R. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
“Records management law” will be a necessary area of specialization because electronic records are as important to daily living as are motor vehicles, and are now the most frequently used kind of evidence. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
The Principles take ESI [electronically stored information] as the parties find it when litigation arises, not as how it could be were parties to pay more appropriate attention to the importance of proper RM and information governance in the first place. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
The City relied on Code § 15.2–2314, which stated that “the governing body, the landowner, and the applicant” were necessary parties to appeals from the BZA to the circuit court. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
Just a couple of weeks ago, Swedish Pirate Party founder Rick Falkvinge had a post on his blog addressing what he called “the most disturbingly false bullshit repeated by pro-copyright-monopoly pundits,” i.e., that “copying is stealing. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
Board of Fire & Police Commissioners, No. 11-2314 (7th Cir. 2/26/13), by clicking here. [read post]