Search for: "Pass v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of" Results 81 - 100 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
Individuals gain direct benefits (thereby enhancing their ability to pass their genes on to offspring) from helping others, but only if this cooperation is underpinned by reciprocity, reputational benefits or punishment of non-cooperators. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am by Deborah Heller
Apple initially moved to dismiss under Illinois Brick for failure to state a claim other than a pass through injury. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  But now, a year or so after the EDGAR data breach, with four (out of five) new SEC commissioners, the SEC’s interest in investigating and charging outsider trading appears to be waning and is no longer a priority. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ali Cooper-Ponte
Additionally, the German legislation creates an exception for the processing of sensitive data in the administration of social security. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
By way of comparison, in 2019 there were 62 federal court securities suits against non-U.S. companies, representing about 15% of all federal court securities suit filings in 2019. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Many court and administrative rulings have been handed down interpreting the application and administration of these statutes, rules, regulations and administrative determinations with respect to layoff of officers and employees in the public service.Essentially, such officers and employees are to be laid off based on their relative seniority in the inverse order of their permanent appointment. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm by sydniemery
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]