Search for: "Patch v. White"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Sangervasi v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
Can the vulnerability be patched or otherwise mitigated? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 5:53 am
The case is Michael v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
Scilex Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Hennigan v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:59 am
We have discussed the manifold challenges of zero day vulnerabilities quite a lot on this blog – why they are central to the cybersecurity challenge, how their discovery is vital to both offensive and defensive postures in cybersecurity, optimal USG policy on stockpiling v. publishing and patching vulnerabilities, and the like. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 1:11 pm
" A zero day is a previously unknown security vulnerability in software or online services that a researcher has discovered, but the developers have not yet had a chance to patch. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:29 am
Whiting, click here. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
White v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
But the Supreme Judicial Court abolished this distinction in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
But the Supreme Judicial Court abolished this distinction in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:41 am
In his book titled Segregation: The Inner Conflict in the South, Warren interviews black and white people around the South in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 2:09 am
Amicus Attorney V+ and Small Firm will work with Vista as long as you change the install path. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:26 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
The patch features a stylized silhouette of a unicorn in black on a diagonally divided field of green and yellow. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:44 am
Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 (1968) and King v. [read post]
