Search for: "Pate v. Pate" Results 141 - 160 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
First, courts can adopt the"essential features" factor which was used in the Supreme Court case Quanta v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
Last week The SPC Blog featured news that The Dutch first instance decision in ratiopharm et al v Lundbeck, concerning the validity of Lundbeck's escitalopram patent (EP 066) had been handed down by the Hague District Court, which held all the claims of Lundbeck's escitalopram patent (and the Dutch Supplementary Protection Certificate which was based upon it) invalid for lack of inventive step. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:31 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]