Search for: "Patel v. Sessions"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Mr Patel is an Indian national who has no right to remain in the UK. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 2:18 am
For judgment, please download: [2015] UKSC 42 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court website (16 Feb 2016 morning session), (16 Feb 2016 afternoon session), (17 Feb 2016 morning session), (17 Feb 2016 afternoon session) [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:46 am
The appeal raised the question of whether Gray can be distinguished and, if not, whether it should be departed from, in particular in the light of the more recent Supreme Court decision concerning illegality in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 (“Patel”). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:45 am
The Supreme Court decision in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 set out a new policy-based approach to the illegality defence at common law. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
Patel — constitutionality of local ordinance permitting police to search hotel guest lists Chappell v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
Patel v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The Defence must be more than merely arguable – see ED & F Man Liquid Products v Patel [2003] EWCA Civ 472 at [8]. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Patel, 2020 WL 6271056 (S.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
In Patel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:20 am
Closing Remarks by Drew Bowden, Director, National Exam Program I missed this session. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm
Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In August 2019, in Patel v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
Mr Jem Aldridge v The Hunts Post (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Carl Waring v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; A woman v The Argus (Brighton) 03/05/2012; Mr Mark Gunter v Guernsey Press & Star (Clause 1), 03/05/2012; Mr Leonard Kernott v Daily Mail (Clause 3), 03/05/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph (Clause 1), 01/05/2012; A woman v East Riding Mail (Clauses 3, 9), 30/04/2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes QC heard a “Norwich Pharmacal” application in the case of Patel v Unite. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
The underlying purpose is for the president to address any urgency that may occur when parliament is not in session. [read post]
