Search for: "Patel v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am by Michael O'Brien
").Like in Smith, Judge Patel remanded the case back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
Extreme Vetting -- As co-bloggers Michael Price and Faiza Patel have noted, the likely way that "extreme vetting" will come to be is through a reboot of the National Security Entry-Exit Registration program known as NSEERs. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
 The essay first very briefly describes the Chinese Social Credit (CSC) system. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
  Because the State Department performs both administrative and law enforcement functions, the Court ‘scrutinized with some skepticism the particular purpose claimed for disputed documents. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by Jack Goldsmith
” As the Supreme Court stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 7:38 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
As Jonathan David Shaub explains in Lawfare, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Nixon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security     Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
In its 1976 decision in Matter of Patel, the BIA stated that it presumed liberty in most cases: “An alien generally is not and should not be detained or required to post bond except on a finding that he is a threat to the national security. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 11:20 pm by Mike
Roskowski involves a homeless man on Social Security with bipolar disorder who would like to be left alone in the library at the University of California Medical Center in San Francisco. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 8 July 2016, Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of Unnadkat v Patel. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
The reason of the rule, which makes a precedent binding lies in the desire to secure uniformity and certainty in the law.Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Miller, Patel, and McCarthy have been viewed as crucial witnesses for understanding government’s response to the assault and former President Trump’s reaction to the breach. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
Related Posts Drawing That Explains Social Networking How to visualize social networking. [read post]