Search for: "Paterno v. Laser Spine Inst."
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
Plaintiffs failed to show that the NTP defendants actively projected themselves into New York to engage in a sustained and substantial transaction of business within New York, thereby purposefully availing themselves of the privilege of conducting activities in New York so as to subject them to long-arm jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR 302(a)(1) (see Paterno v Laser Spine Inst., 24 NY3d 370 [2014]; Bloomgarden v Lanza, 143 AD3d… [read post]