Search for: "Patrick Wright"
Results 221 - 232
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2008, 1:42 pm
Jeremiah Wright -- had evaporated. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 8:57 am
Patrick’s Day. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
- Chicago attorney Patrick J. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Studies using polygraph examinations to elicit disclosures have found that sex offenders have often committed sex crimes that went undisclosed and were never reported to police or child protection agencies (Ahlmeyer, Heil, McKee, & English, 2000; English, Jones, Pasini-Hill, Patrick, & Cooley-Towell, 2000; Heil, Ahlmeyer, & Simons, 2003). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 12:55 pm
A viewing of hearing and trial transcripts and various pleadings of the cases of Marla Wright, Wendy Titelman, Bahji Adams, Donna Marie Smith, and Peter Popham, all in Cobb County, Georgia undeniably shows venomous and disqualifying comments by these judges directed toward these victims. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 4:29 pm
Patrick Doody in The Patent System is Not Broken, 18 Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal 10 (December 2006) suggested that various legal academics were recycling ideas from Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 8:19 am
Representing Appellee (Respondent): Patrick J. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:00 pm
Atlanta, GA (Orl) Patrick Oot Director of E-Discovery & Senior Counsel Verizon Arlington, VA (DC) Robert D. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:00 am
Atlanta, GA (Orl) Patrick Oot Director of E-Discovery & Senior Counsel Verizon Arlington, VA (DC) Robert D. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
First Amendment Principles in Practice, Moderator: Patrick Lynch, O'Melveny & Myers LLP David Vladeck, Georgetown University Law Center: Why has there been so little post-Nike development in caselaw, despite predictions? [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:34 pm
Application in Practice of the First Amendment PrinciplesModerator: Patrick Lynch, O'Melveny & Myers LLP Panelists: Bruce Johnson, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP; Robert Lasnik, U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 4:25 pm
Contrary to the hearing officer, Chairman Battista, with Member Liebman concurring and Member Schaumber dissenting, found that the Employer's changes in work policies on Oct. 20, 2004, Supervisor James Jones' creation of an impression of surveillance, and Jones' interrogation of employee Patrick Terris constituted objectionable conduct. [read post]
