Search for: "Patterson et al v. Grant et al" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
06/30/09 orders by Judge Vaughn Walker, granting motions of several Cooper & Kirk attorneys to represent Prop 8 Official Proponents, in Perry et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:30 pm
The law firm claimed Woods et al. owed $47,000 for legal fees; Woods claimed the law firm committed legal malpractice. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
MACNEIL, et al., Defendants - Appellees, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division (District Court Docket No. 3:08-cv-507-J-33) DEATH WARRANT CASE EXECUTION SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1, 2008 REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Charles E. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 154634/20 Appeal No. 16180 Case No. 2021-01665 [*1]In the Matter of Jermell Martinez, Petitioner-Appellant, vCity of New York et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Index No. 154634/20 Appeal No. 16180 Case No. 2021-01665 [*1]In the Matter of Jermell Martinez, Petitioner-Appellant, vCity of New York et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:04 am by Don Cruse
Jerry Patterson, et al., No. 09-0387, from its active docket until the Fifth Circuit spoke first about whether the underlying controversy had been mooted by Ms. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:30 am by Don Cruse
Jerry Patterson, et al., No. 09-0387 (more info) This case was a certified question from the Fifth Circuit about questions of Texas state law, which the Texas Supreme Court agreed to answer. [read post]