Search for: "Patton v. United States District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Patton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Attorney’s Fees in a Copyright Action« Win One for the Gipper »  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-1157 Just as famous as some great upsets in sports history are the motivational speeches that inspired them. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
However, in one, Patton v British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, 2020 BCSC 554 (“Patton”), the court simply noted that Vavilov had not affected any of the matters at issue in that case. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7449 Issues: (1) Whether a district court has the authority to reconsider the merits of a 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am by Josh H. Escovedo
”  However, in August 2013, after months of discussion on the issue, the Composers opted to file an action for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, seeking a judgment that “Blurred Lines” does not infringe “Got to Give it Up. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
The 2011 district court opinion dealt with numerous interesting issues. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 And so on to February: In Utah, District Judge Dale Kimball blocked TV streaming company Aereo from operating in several Western U.S. states, at least until the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
It sounds relaxing, indeed.* Patentability: a perpetual problem Jeremy reports on Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, an extempore Patent Court, England and Wales, ruling in which Mr Justice Mann addressed the patentability of an invention consisting of a machine supposed to produce a surplus of energy to that which was needed in order to operate it. [read post]