Search for: "Patton v. United States District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/07/0635669c2.pdf United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
However, in one, Patton v British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board, 2020 BCSC 554 (“Patton”), the court simply noted that Vavilov had not affected any of the matters at issue in that case. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by Aaron
The court found that although the provisions of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:39 am
And in the United States, of course, you're allowed to publish true information, even if it hurts someone. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:05 pm
Signature decision, 149 F.3d 1368, which reversed a district court decision (United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts) granting summary judgment of invalidity of Signature's U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
This post reviews some of the highlights of the court battles of 2014 in Canada and other Commonwealth countries, the United States and the European Union. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
They point out that this is 3M’s third bite at the apple — the company previously filed two similar cases in New York state court. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 And so on to February: In Utah, District Judge Dale Kimball blocked TV streaming company Aereo from operating in several Western U.S. states, at least until the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
It sounds relaxing, indeed.* Patentability: a perpetual problem Jeremy reports on Peter Crowley v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, an extempore Patent Court, England and Wales, ruling in which Mr Justice Mann addressed the patentability of an invention consisting of a machine supposed to produce a surplus of energy to that which was needed in order to operate it. [read post]