Search for: "Paul Branch vs State of Florida"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 7:40 am
I went for a few cases I knew, like Hamdan vs. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Our role is very clear: We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Free Speech vs. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:20 pm
Department of State. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 1:29 pm
Paul Stockton, former assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and Americas’ security affairs at the Department of Defense, and Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at AEI, will give remarks. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
., excavation contractor will pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that they used earth-moving equipment to construct a dam on a tributary of Spring Branch Creek without first obtaining a necessary permit from the U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 1:47 pm
” Melinda Haring, deputy director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia center, will moderate the panel discussion with Michel; Ben Judah, nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Europe Center; Paul Massaro, senior policy advisor at the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; and Michael Sallah, senior investigations editor at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Even the judge in Florida that struck down the entire law didn't buy the Medicaid argument. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
