Search for: "Paul Lawrence Barnett"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Lawrence B. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have pla [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Barnett, Was the Constitution Pro-Slavery? [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
I greatly appreciate Doug NeJaime and Reva Siegel’s statement that my book (and Chapter 6 on the “ghost of Lochner” in particular) offers a “powerful explanation” of how the modern substantive due process cases like Roe, Lawrence, and Obergefell are different from the old substantive due process cases like Lochner. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 1:57 pm
Without doubt, the most eye-catching name among the claimants is that of Doreen Lawrence, the mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2020-2021 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
Gerhardt, The Power of Precedent (Oxford 2008) Robert Bennett & Lawrence Solum, Constitutional Originalism (Cornell 2011) Gary L McDowell, The Language of Law & the Foundations of American Constitutionalism (Cambridge 2010) Eric Segall, Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges (Praeger 2012) Michael Greve, The Upside-Down Constitution (Harvard 2012) Alexander Tsesis, The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom (NYU 2004) 2011: H. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Bollinger (2003), Lawrence v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Bollinger (2003), Lawrence v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Below the fold are the results of the 2019-2020 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
Rand Paul (Ky.) on Monday said that he will support President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh,” noting that “[w]ith Paul’s decision to support Kavanaugh, the already uphill path for Democrats to block his nomination gets even narrower. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Over the last couple of years, I've been looking closely at injunctions against libel, and I've come to agree with the emerging view in recent appellate court decisions -- such injunctions, if properly crafted, are constitutional. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:51 am
But, as Professor Gienapp notes, so too did the original critic of originalism, Paul Brest, the man who coined the label “originalism. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
Paul, MN: West Group, 4th ed., 1998.Collins, Hugh. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:22 pm
Former solicitors general Neal Katyal and Paul Clement reached the same conclusion, as has Randy Barnett. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm
Milligan and Paul E. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:55 pm
In particular, both Solum and Randy Barnett tend to highlight the importance of Paul Brest’s early article critiquing “originalism,” which, as they emphasize, was then a new term in constitutional theory. [read post]
