Search for: "Paul Rosenzweig"
Results 401 - 420
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2017, 4:09 am
Paul Rosenzweig noted that the form is quite complex and that mistakes, like those which Kushner blamed for his having to file corrections, are within the realm of possibility. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
Paul Rosenzweig posted a reply to Scarlet Kim and Mailyn Fidler’s July 11 critique of the proposed U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
Paul Rosenzweig noted that the SF-86 form required for a security clearance, which Jared Kushner has been criticized for twice failing to file correctly, is quite complex. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
Herb Lin argued that it’s not always a bad idea to cooperate with bad actors in cyberspace, countering Paul Rosenzweig’s piece from last week. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:00 pm
ICYMI: This weekend, on Lawfare Paul Rosenzweig noted China’s recent legal moves to crack down on parliamentary supporters of Hong Kong independence. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
In a July 11 posting, Paul Rosenzweig argued that cyber cooperation with bad actors is always a bad idea, specifically referring to the President’s incomprehensible idea to form with Russia “an impenetrable Cyber Security unit [with Russia] so that election hacking, & many other negative things, will be guarded. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Given the episode, Paul Rosenzweig argued that cyber cooperation with rivals like Russia remains a bad idea for U.S. security. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:12 pm
Paul Rosenzweig argued that cyber cooperation with bad actors is never a good idea. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:31 pm
Paul Rosenzweig argued that how one frames the issue of immigration greatly affects how one answers the question. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
Stewart Baker posted the Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast featuring an interview with the Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima and a wide range of recent news: Wittes posted this week’s Rational Security featuring the reunited crew, a “Russian Chokehold,” the travel ban, and Wittes’ new source of power: In cybersecurity news, Paul Rosenzweig initially asked if the apparent attack in Ukraine was a precursor to war, but updated… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm
Paul Rosenzweig asked if the cyberattack in Ukraine yesterday was a precursor to war, but updated the post after news broke that the cause was an outbreak of the Petya ransomware. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
Paul Rosenzweig noted that while likely correct at this stage, this does not actually disprove the existence of an ongoing investigation. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:46 am
Paul Rosenzweig is the founder of Red Branch Consulting PLLC, a homeland security consulting company, and a senior advisor to The Chertoff Group. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 2:21 pm
Paul Rosenzweig argued that Trump probably would not be notified if he were under investigation. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Paul Rosenzweig pointed out that Kasowitz may have violated the Rules of Professional Conduct by reportedly informing White House aides that they did not yet need to hire personal lawyers. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
Paul Rosenzweig announced an upcoming event he is hosting at The Heritage Foundation, "Digital Security and Due Process: Modernizing Cross-Border Surveillance Law for the Cloud Era" featuring remarks by Kent Walker, Senior VP and General Counsel of Google. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 9:21 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul Rosenzweig announced Lawfare’s decision to sell its bitcoin. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:40 am
Paul Rosenzweig highlighted three cyber attacks on Qatar that may have been overshadowed by the Comey testimony. [read post]
10 Jun 2017, 5:58 am
Paul Rosenzweig commented on the mens rea aspect of an obstruction of justice offense—and how Trump’s best defense may just be, “I’m ignorant. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Carrie Cordero, a former attorney at the National Security Division of the Justice Department, and Paul Rosenzweig, who worked for Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, for a conversation on the Comey testimony and its implications. [read post]
