Search for: "Paul v. Sharpe" Results 61 - 80 of 341
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2019, 10:05 am by JB
For the Symposium on Mary Anne Franks, The Cult of the Constitution (Stanford University Press, 2019).In her new book, The Cult of the Constitution, Mary Anne Franks argues that the Constitution is a document of white male supremacy. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm by Paul C. Light
The overall takeaway was a warning about the need to address what former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Paul A. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 22 and 23 July 2019 the same judge heard the trial in the case of Fentiman v Marsh. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 5:10 pm by Katie Bart
’” Treanor prodded Kagan on her sharp dissent in Knick v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
John Donohue on the Legacy of Justice Stevens, in Sharp Contrast to Justice Scalia Justice John Paul Stevens, who died this week, came to be defined in part by his sharply contrasting antagonist Antonin Scalia, the previous Supreme Court Justice to die (in February 2016). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts As already mentioned, on 9 July 2019 Sharp P and Warby J handed down judgment in the case of HM Attorney-General v Yaxley-Lennon [2019] EWHC 1791 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
On 1 July 2019 DJ Paul Gambaccini and Sir Cliff Richard launched a petition outside Parliament, calling for anonymity for sexual offence suspects. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
Broadcasting Paul Bernal’s Blog has a piece on “Impartiality and the BBC …” Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation  The Columbia Journalism Review has a post “Do technology companies care about journalism? [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:30 pm by Howard Bashman
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit consisting of Circuit Judges Paul V. [read post]